As of October 2011, 200 million images bore the CC-licensed photo mark. Flickr keeps tabs of which of the six CC licences its photographers are opting for and, at last glance, it was one demanding ...
A company sells a printed or digital product. And give away a simple version of the copy under creative commons, right? Here's how I would interpret it. * A single licensee (teacher, school, etc) ...
No one is forcing anyone to put their work into the public commons. But, once you do, you need to accept that you no longer can wholly control how it is used. Gordon Haff is Red Hat's cloud evangelist ...
2) The materials in question is obtainable in the "commons" but with strings attached. This means it does not matter how FedEx got the copyrighted materials. 3) The school is not a party to this suit ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results